You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical guidelines for endoscopic mucosal resection of non-pedunculated colorectal lesions.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.17235/reed.2018.5086/2017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eduardo Albéniz, María Pellisé, Antonio Z Gimeno-García, Alfredo José Lucendo, Pedro A Alonso-Aguirre, Alberto Herreros de Tejada, Marco Antonio Álvarez, María Fraile, Maite Herráiz Bayod, Leopoldo López Rosés, David Martínez Ares, Akiko Ono, Adolfo Parra Blanco, Eduardo Redondo, Andrés Sánchez-Yagüe, Santiago Soto, José Díaz-Tasende, Marta Montes Díaz, Manuel Rodríguez-Téllez, Orlando García, Alba Zuñiga Ripa, Marta Hernández Conde, Fernando Alberca de Las Parras, Carla Jerusalén Gargallo, Esteban Saperas, Miguel Muñoz Navas, Javier Gordillo, Felipe Ramos Zabala, José Manuel Echevarría, Marco Bustamante, Mariano González-Haba, Ferrán González-Huix, Begoña González-Suárez, Juan José Vila Costas, Carlos Guarner Argente, Fernando Múgica, Julyssa Cobián, Joaquín Rodríguez Sánchez, Bartolomé López Viedma, Noel Pin, José Carlos Marín Gabriel, Óscar Nogales, Joaquín de la Peña, Francisco Javier Navajas León, Helena León Brito, David Remedios, José Miguel Esteban, David Barquero, Juan Gabriel Martínez Cara, Felipe Martínez Alcalá, Ignacio Fernández-Urién, Eduardo Valdivielso |
| Abstract |
This document summarizes the contents of the Clinical Guidelines for the Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Non-Pedunculated Colorectal Lesions that was developed by the working group of the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (GSEED of Endoscopic Resection). This document presents recommendations for the endoscopic management of superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 43 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 53% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,346,312
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas
#492
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#329,535
of 453,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.