↓ Skip to main content

Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students

Overview of attention for article published in Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Questionnaire to Measure the Participation of Nursing Professionals in Mentoring Students
Published in
Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, June 2017
DOI 10.17533/udea.iee.v35n2a07
Pubmed ID
Authors

Agueda Cervera-Gasch, Loreto Macia-Soler, Blanca Torres-Manrique, Desirée Mena-Tudela, Pablo Salas-Medina, María Isabel Orts-Cortes, Víctor M González-Chordá

Abstract

The aim herein was to validate a questionnaire to measure the level of participation of clinical nursing professionals in the mentorship of nursing students during clinical practices. Design and validation of a questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the tool were determined through four phases: 1- literature review; 2- evaluation of content validity; 3- pilot test, cognitive pretest and intra-observer reliability study; 4- construct validity study through an exploratory factor analysis of main components with varimax rotation in a sample of 249 nursing professionals from primary care and hospital care from different Spanish provinces. The internal consistency was studied with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. The global content validity was above 0.8. The final version of the questionnaire had 33 items, with a global intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.852 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.837. Factor analysis explained 55.4% of the total variance, with a solution of five factors that made up the dimensions: Implication, Motivation, Satisfaction, Obstacles, and Commitment. The questionnaire evaluated has adequate validity and reliability to permit determining the level of nurse participation in the mentorship of students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 33 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 36%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Engineering 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 37 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#107
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,491
of 330,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.