↓ Skip to main content

Puerperae bonding with their children and labor experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 132)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Puerperae bonding with their children and labor experiences
Published in
Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, October 2017
DOI 10.17533/udea.iee.v35n3a13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lara Helk Souza, Zaida Aurora Sperli Geraldes Soler, Maria de Lourdes Sperli Geraldes Santos, Natália Sperli Geraldes Marin Dos Santos Sasaki

Abstract

To analyze the degree of bonding of puerperae with their babies, both in isolation and associated with experiences during and after labor. A cross-sectional study carried out among 200 puerperae in São José do Rio Preto, Brazil. To evaluate the mother-child bond, we used the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS). The mean age of puerperae was 26.4 years; most women were white (60.0%), were married (87.5%), and had an elementary education (51.5%). Most deliveries were cesarean (80.0% of cases); 68.0% of women had no pain during labor, and only 54% had skin-to-skin contact immediately after delivery. Type of labor and pain did not significantly change the maternal bond, and the lack of skin-to-skin contact negatively influenced the bond. Pueperae participants had a high degree of bonding with their babies that is mainly related to history of skin-to-skin contact. Nurses must promote strategies that encourage skin-to-skin contact between mother and newborn in the delivery room.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 13 28%
Psychology 6 13%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#36
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,456
of 335,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.