↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding support practices in a neonatal intensive care unit in Colombia

Overview of attention for article published in Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 132)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and facilitators to breastfeeding support practices in a neonatal intensive care unit in Colombia
Published in
Investigación y Educación en Enfermería, March 2021
DOI 10.17533/udea.iee.v39n1e11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haley Abugov, Sandra Catalina Ochoa Marín, Sonia Semenic, Isabel Cristina Arroyave

Abstract

To assess breastfeeding support practices and related barriers and facilitators in a large Intensive Care Unit, Neonatal (NICU) in Medellín, Colombia, as part of a broader quality improvement initiative to enhance breastfeeding support. A mixed-methods descriptive design was used to collect data on care practices and outcomes related to NICU breastfeeding support. Data sources included the Neo-BFHI's self-assessment questionnaire of breastfeeding policies and practices, clinical observations, and a retrospective review of 51 patient charts. Of the 51 charts reviewed, 98% of the infants received breastmilk during their hospitalization but the majority (84%) also received formula and only 8% of infants were exclusively breastfed at the time of NICU discharge. All NICU staff received education on mother and baby-friendly care, and the unit complied with the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk substitutes. However, resources to support lactation (e.g., access to breastfeeding specialists, breast pumps, written teaching materials for parents) were limited, and infants were only allowed to consume milk expressed within the hospital. Mother-infant separation, as well as staff beliefs and care routines, also limited important breastfeeding support practices such as skin-to-skin care and early initiation of direct breastfeeding. The self-assessment questionnaire and observations revealed a high value for breastfeeding and a family-centered approach to care in the NICU. Key challenges to sustaining breastfeeding in the NICU included a lack of facilities for supporting parental presence, barriers to expression and provision of mother's milk, and a high rate of bottle-feeding with formula.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 55 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 25 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 58 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#32
of 132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,142
of 451,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigación y Educación en Enfermería
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.