↓ Skip to main content

Performance of cognitive brief test in elderly patients with dementia in advanced stage living in an urban community of Lima, Peru.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 458)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance of cognitive brief test in elderly patients with dementia in advanced stage living in an urban community of Lima, Peru.
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, December 2016
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2016.334.2549
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nilton Custodio, Carlos Alva-Diaz, Yahaira Becerra-Becerra, Rosa Montesinos, David Lira, Eder Herrera-Pérez, Sheila Castro-Suárez, José Cuenca-Alfaro, Elizabeth Valeriano-Lorenzo

Abstract

Evaluate the performance of clock drawing test- Manos versión (PDR-M) and Mini Mental State Examination -Peruvian version (MMSE) to detect dementia in a sample based on urban community of Lima, Peru. This study is a secondary analysis database, observational, analytical and cross-sectional, the gold standard was the clinical and the neuropsychological evaluations together. Performance testing individually and in combination were evaluated.. Data were obtained from prevalence study conducted in 2008 in Cercado de Lima. MMSE performance for evaluation of patients with dementia of any kind showed sensitivity of 64,1%, specificity of 84,1%, PPV of 24.4%, NPV of 96.7%, PLR of 4,03 and NLR of 0,43. PDR-M showed sensitivity of 89,3%, specificity of 98,1%, PPV of 79.3%, NPV of 99.1%, PLR of 47,79 and NLR of 0,11. When both tests were applied, and at least one of them was positive, they showed sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 84.1%, PPV of 33.1%, NPV of 99.8%, PLR of 6,17 and NLR of 0,02. When performing separate analysis of Alzheimer-type dementia and non- Alzheimer dementia, the values of the parameters do not differ substantially from those obtained for dementia of any kind. The combination of MMSE and PDR-M show good discriminative ability to detect moderate and severe dementia in population living in urban community in Lima.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Psychology 5 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,837,286
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#33
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,993
of 420,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.