↓ Skip to main content

Intervenciones para prevenir la aparición de sobrepeso y obesidad en niños menores de cinco años

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intervenciones para prevenir la aparición de sobrepeso y obesidad en niños menores de cinco años
Published in
Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública, December 2017
DOI 10.17843/rpmesp.2017.344.2636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Bonilla, Gisely Híjar, Delia Márquez, Adolfo Aramburú, Juan Pablo Aparco, Ericson L Gutiérrez

Abstract

Childhood obesity is one of the most severe public health problems worldwide. The present study describes the interventions used to prevent overweight and obesity in children younger than 5 years. The objective of the interventions was to stimulate breastfeeding, monitor the child's growth, and promote adequate complementary feeding by means of nutritional counseling using a responsive feeding approach in different settings, including health centers and residences. The interventions included physical activity and nutritional counseling, with the active participation of the parents. The quality of evidence from most studies was high because the evidence was derived from controlled clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. All interventions were conducted or could be replicated in Peru by adequate contextualization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 18%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Professor 8 4%
Researcher 7 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 77 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 15%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Sports and Recreations 3 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 83 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#166
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,315
of 444,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Pública
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.