You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Las tareas zoológicas de la Real Expedición Botánica del Nuevo Reino de Granada (1783-1816)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.18257/raccefyn.1016 |
Authors |
Germán Amat-García, Henry D. Agudelo-Zamora |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales
#119
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,103
of 392,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them