↓ Skip to main content

La integralidad desde la perspectiva del cuidado en salud: una experiencia del Sistema Único de Salud en Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Salud colectiva, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
La integralidad desde la perspectiva del cuidado en salud: una experiencia del Sistema Único de Salud en Brasil
Published in
Salud colectiva, March 2016
DOI 10.18294/sc.2016.874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clarissa Terenzi Seixas, Emerson Elias Merhy, Rossana Staevie Baduy, Helvo Slomp

Abstract

Starting with a discussion of the biomedical model and its implications in the shaping of healthcare professionals and health practices, this article analyzes the concept of integrality as associated with the Unified Health System (SUS) [Sistema Único de Salud] in Brazil. Particular attention is paid to the disputes regarding the meaning of integrality and the ways of putting the concept into practice in everyday health care work. Based in a research study conducted at the national level, the authors suggest two aspects crucial to fostering integrality: an ethical-political project founded in the recognition that other people's lives are worthwhile and enriching; as well as the existence of additional spaces conducive to discovering diverse ways of producing life, in which integrality in health care is also possible and powerful. The authors affirm the relevance of this process as a contribution to the continual construction of the SUS in Brazil.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Social Sciences 8 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 12 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,032,385
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Salud colectiva
#153
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,311
of 315,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Salud colectiva
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.