↓ Skip to main content

¿Sabemos lo que comemos?: Percepciones sobre el riesgo alimentario en Cataluña, España

Overview of attention for article published in Salud colectiva, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
¿Sabemos lo que comemos?: Percepciones sobre el riesgo alimentario en Cataluña, España
Published in
Salud colectiva, December 2016
DOI 10.18294/sc.2016.932
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva Zafra Aparici, Araceli Muñoz García, Cristina Larrea-Killinger

Abstract

This article describes and analyzes social perceptions regarding food risks in Catalonia (Spain). In particular it uses the narratives of informants to determine which foods are perceived as dangerous and how, when, where and why this perception of risk develops. Through a qualitative research study, we explored how lay discourses are constructed and managed, creating diverse imaginaries regarding food risk that do not always coincide with the biomedical view. It is highlighted that food risk is not always associated with the dangers of progress or industrialization, nor is it necessarily focused on the dichotomous debate of "industrially produced food" versus "natural food"; rather food risk perceptions revolve around a series of possibilities that are also related to the production, distribution, preparation and/or consumption of food.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 20%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Engineering 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 13 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2017.
All research outputs
#15,053,040
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Salud colectiva
#92
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,578
of 425,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Salud colectiva
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.