↓ Skip to main content

Inclusion of salt form on prescription medication labeling as a source of patient confusion: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmacy Practice (Granada), March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inclusion of salt form on prescription medication labeling as a source of patient confusion: a pilot study
Published in
Pharmacy Practice (Granada), March 2016
DOI 10.18549/pharmpract.2016.01.677
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana J. McDougall, James D. Hoehns, Tara T. Feller, Savana J. Kriener, Matthew J. Witry

Abstract

It has been estimated that 10,000 patient injuries occur in the US annually due to confusion involving drug names. An unexplored source of patient misunderstandings may be medication salt forms. The objective of this study was to assess patient knowledge and comprehension regarding the salt forms of medications as a potential source of medication errors. A 12 item questionnaire which assessed patient knowledge of medication names on prescription labels was administered to a convenience sample of patients presenting to a family practice clinic. Descriptive statistics were calculated and multivariate analyses were performed. There were 308 responses. Overall, 41% of patients agreed they find their medication names confusing. Participants correctly answered to salt form questions between 12.1% and 56.9% of the time. Taking more prescription medications and higher education level were positively associated with providing more correct answers to 3 medication salt form knowledge questions, while age was negatively associated. Patient misconceptions about medication salt forms are common. These findings support recommendations to standardize the inclusion or exclusion of salt forms. Increasing patient education is another possible approach to reducing confusion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Librarian 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 11 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 12 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2022.
All research outputs
#17,165,092
of 26,005,389 outputs
Outputs from Pharmacy Practice (Granada)
#171
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,989
of 314,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmacy Practice (Granada)
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,005,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.