↓ Skip to main content

Clinical and subclinical maternal hypothyroidism and their effects on neurodevelopment, behavior and cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical and subclinical maternal hypothyroidism and their effects on neurodevelopment, behavior and cognition
Published in
Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, March 2020
DOI 10.20945/2359-3997000000201
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alice Batistuzzo, Miriam Oliveira Ribeiro

Abstract

Clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism are the most common hormonal dysfunctions during pregnancy. Insufficient maternal thyroid hormones (THs) in the early stages of pregnancy can lead to severe impairments in the development of the central nervous system because THs are critical to central nervous system development. In the fetus and after birth, THs participate in neurogenic processes, cell differentiation, neuronal activation, axonal growth, dendritic arborization, synaptogenesis and myelination. Although treatment is simple and effective, approximately 30% of pregnant women in Brazil with access to prenatal care have their first consultation after the first trimester of pregnancy, and any delay in diagnosis and resulting treatment delay may lead to cognitive impairment in children. This review summarizes the effects of clinical and subclinical hypothyroidism on fetal neurodevelopment, behavior and cognition in humans and rodents. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2020;64(1):89-95.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 33 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 36 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,733,516
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#325
of 801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,247
of 390,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.