↓ Skip to main content

Probiotic therapy outcomes in body composition of children and adolescent with obesity, a nonrandomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probiotic therapy outcomes in body composition of children and adolescent with obesity, a nonrandomized controlled trial
Published in
Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, October 2022
DOI 10.20945/2359-3997000000526
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thaís Léo Pacheco Marcelo, Caroline Rosa Pellicciari, Thiago Olivetti Artioli, Dânae Braga Diamante Leiderman, Ana Lúcia Torloni Gradinar, Marcelo Mimica, Cristiane Kochi

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of probiotic supplementation therapy on anthropometric values and body composition of children and adolescent with obesity. This is a nonrandomized controlled, prospective, double-blind interventional clinical trial with primary data analysis. The sample comprised 44 pubertal children and adolescent (8-17 years old) with obesity. The patients were allocated to probiotic (Lactobacillus rhamnosus) or placebo group, with matching of gender and chronological age. Both groups received nutritional guidance, and were followed for six months. In all patients the anthropometric assessment was carried out by a nutritionist and data on weight, height and waist circumference (WC) were collected. Body composition was assessed using dual emission X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). After six months, both groups had increased weight, height but reduced body index mass (BMI) standard deviation score, with no differences between groups. After the intervention, both groups showed a reduction in the percentage of total body fat and an increase in lean mass, but only the placebo group showed a reduction in the percentage of trunk fat. However, the variation in these parameters did not differ between groups. The probiotic group does not seem to have benefited from supplementation. However, we suggest that this reduction in BMI SDS in both groups may have occurred due to improvements in diet because of the nutritional advice given throughout the therapy. We concluded that supplementation with this strain of probiotic was not effective in promoting weight loss or improving the body composition of this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Other 3 12%
Researcher 2 8%
Librarian 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,887,917
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#214
of 274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#351,973
of 440,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.