↓ Skip to main content

Critical overview of current anthropometric methods in comparison with a new index to make early detection of overweight in Spanish university students: the Normalised Weight-Adjusted Index

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrición Hospitalaria, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Critical overview of current anthropometric methods in comparison with a new index to make early detection of overweight in Spanish university students: the Normalised Weight-Adjusted Index
Published in
Nutrición Hospitalaria, March 2018
DOI 10.20960/nh.1189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillermo Doménech-Asensi, Carlos Gómez-Gallego, Gaspar Ros-Berruezo, Francisco Javier García-Alonso, Manuel Canteras-Jordana

Abstract

overweight and obesity have been increasing, and university students are an important target for prevention programs. Previous studies have reported differences in the diagnosis between different anthropometric methods, so some students can be misclassified depending on the method used. to evaluate the efficacy of different anthropometric methods to detect those university students in a probable status of overweight, including a comparison with a new proposed method, the normalized weight-adjusted index (NWAI). different anthropometric methods (waist circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio, body mass index, conicity index, bioimpedance and Brozek, Siri and Heath-Carter equations) were calculated for 505 university students. By k-means cluster analysis, students with higher values according to variables involved in overweight were identified. Parameters of accuracy were calculated by operating characteristic curves. NWAI showed significant correlations with the most used methods. Prevalence of students with body fat excess varied from 5.9% to 48.4% for women and from 8.5% to 49.0% for men depending of the method employed, being demonstrated a great variability between the different methodologies. Body mass index for women and waist circumference for men resulted to be the most accurate methods to detect a probable situation of excess of body fat or cardiovascular risk associated. NWAI resulted also a good alternative for overweight classification. differences between anthropometric methods for overweight and cardiovascular disease risk classification were confirmed. Classical cut-off point may misdiagnose overweight or health risk in Spanish university students depending of the method employed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%