↓ Skip to main content

Resistencia bacteriana de cultivos de orina en un hospital oncológico:seguimiento a diez años

Overview of attention for article published in Salud Pública de México, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resistencia bacteriana de cultivos de orina en un hospital oncológico:seguimiento a diez años
Published in
Salud Pública de México, January 2016
DOI 10.21149/spm.v58i4.8025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Consuelo Velázquez-Acosta, Patricia Cornejo-Juárez, Patricia Volkow-Fernández

Abstract

To describe the incidence and patterns of bacterial resistance in urine samples from a tertiary care oncology hospital in Mexico, from 2004 to 2013. We included the strains obtained from urine cultures, describing separately multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. We analyzed the susceptibility to different antibiotics. 51 202 urine cultures were processed during the study; 14 480 (28.3%) cultures were positive. In 11 427 samples Gram negative (79%) were isolated, 2 080 Gram positive (14.4%), and 973 yeasts (6.6%). Escherichia coli was the most frequent bacteria identified (56.1%); 24% of the community strains and 65.7% of the nosocomial were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers (ESBL). Klebsiella pneumoniae was isolated in 705 samples (4.8%); 115 were ESBL (16%), 13.1% from community and 29.8% from nosocomial source. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was identified in 593 cultures (4.1%): 9% from community and 51% nosocomial. MDR bacteria were more frequent in nosocomial isolates. It should be a priority to intensify the rational use of antimicrobials in the community and antibiotic stewardship in the hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Professor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 18 46%