↓ Skip to main content

How the interbank market becomes systemically dangerous: an agent-based network model of financial distress propagation

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Network Theory in Finance, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How the interbank market becomes systemically dangerous: an agent-based network model of financial distress propagation
Published in
The Journal of Network Theory in Finance, February 2017
DOI 10.21314/jntf.2017.025
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Lecturer 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 26%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,293,630
of 27,788,362 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Network Theory in Finance
#4
of 10 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,596
of 431,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Network Theory in Finance
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,788,362 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.