↓ Skip to main content

Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Redo Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in the era of Advanced PCI
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, January 2022
DOI 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ter-Er Kusu-Orkar, Kellan Masharani, Amer Harky, Andrew D Muir

Abstract

To review the evidence behind the role and relevance of redo coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the current practice of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed to identify articles that discuss the practice of PCI and redo CABG in patients that require coronary revascularization. All relevant studies are summarized in narrative manner to reflect current indications and preference. The advancement in utilization of PCI has reduced the rate of redo CABG in patients with previous CABG that requires revascularization of an already treated coronary disease or a new onset of coronary artery stenosis. Redo CABG is associated with satisfactory perioperative outcomes but higher mortality at immediate postoperative period when compared to PCI. Redo CABG patients are less likely to develop comorbidities associated with revascularisation, but the operative mortality is higher and long-term survival rates are similar in comparison to PCI. There is a need for further research into the role of redo CABG in the current advanced practice of PCI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%