↓ Skip to main content

Genetics of Obesity: What have we Learned?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Genomics, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 468)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
369 X users
patent
4 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
554 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetics of Obesity: What have we Learned?
Published in
Current Genomics, May 2011
DOI 10.2174/138920211795677895
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hélène Choquet, David Meyre

Abstract

Candidate gene and genome-wide association studies have led to the discovery of nine loci involved in Mendelian forms of obesity and 58 loci contributing to polygenic obesity. These loci explain a small fraction of the heritability for obesity and many genes remain to be discovered. However, efforts in obesity gene identification greatly modified our understanding of this disorder. In this review, we propose an overlook of major lessons learned from 15 years of research in the field of genetics and obesity. We comment on the existence of the genetic continuum between monogenic and polygenic forms of obesity that pinpoints the role of genes involved in the central regulation of food intake and genetic predisposition to obesity. We explain how the identification of novel obesity predisposing genes has clarified unsuspected biological pathways involved in the control of energy balance that have helped to understand past human history and to explore causality in epidemiology. We provide evidence that obesity predisposing genes interact with the environment and influence the response to treatment relevant to disease prediction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 369 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 554 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Morocco 1 <1%
Unknown 541 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 118 21%
Student > Bachelor 113 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 66 12%
Researcher 54 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 5%
Other 69 12%
Unknown 106 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 104 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 97 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 5%
Social Sciences 19 3%
Other 85 15%
Unknown 130 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 322. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#105,984
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Current Genomics
#2
of 468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283
of 122,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Genomics
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.