You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of rice straw broth as an appropriate medium to isolate purple nonsulfur bacteria from paddy fields
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2225/vol15-issue6-fulltext-9 |
| Authors |
Tomorn Nunkaew, Duangporn Kantachote, Teruhiko Nitoda, Hiroshi Kanzaki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 52% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
#46
of 198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,400
of 192,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Journal of Biotechnology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them