You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Índice de área foliar e indicadores de productividad forrajera de Lotus corniculatus L. en diferentes contenidos de humedad del suelo y estaciones del año
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.22319/rmcp.v15i1.6472 |
| Authors |
Aurelio Pedroza Sandoval, Sahara Xolocotzi Acoltzi, Ricardo Trejo Calzada, Gabino García de los Santos, Perpetuo Álvarez Vázquez, Jesús Guadalupe Arreola Ávila |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2024.
All research outputs
#17,604,954
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
#32
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,296
of 352,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista mexicana de ciencias pecuarias
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.