You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Protecting and improving breastfeeding practices during a major emergency: lessons learnt from the baby tents in Haiti
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2471/blt.12.113936 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed Ag Ayoya, Kate Golden, Ismael Ngnie-Teta, Marjolein D Moreaux, Aissa Mamadoultaibou, Leslie Koo, Erin Boyd, Jean Max Beauliere, Celine Lesavre, Joseline Pierre Marhone |
| Abstract |
The 2010 earthquake in Haiti displaced about 1.5 million people, many of them into camps for internally displaced persons. It was expected that disruption of breastfeeding practices would lead to increased infant morbidity, malnutrition and mortality. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 1% |
| Librarian | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 1% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 92% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 69 | 91% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#7,421,564
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#206
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,778
of 210,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them