You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing equity in the geographical distribution of community pharmacies in South Africa in preparation for a national health insurance scheme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of the World Health Organization, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2471/blt.13.130005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kim Ward, David Sanders, Henry Leng, Allyson M Pollock |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 94% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 94% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#259
of 599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,072
of 243,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the World Health Organization
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.