You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
La variabilidad del caudal del río Acaponeta inferida mediante series de anillos de crecimiento en coníferas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Tecnología y ciencias del agua, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.24850/j-tyca-2017-03-04 |
| Authors |
José Villanueva, Armando Gómez, Julián Cerano, Sergio Rosales, Juan Estrada, Luis U. Castruita, Aldo R. Martínez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,370,994
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Tecnología y ciencias del agua
#4
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,904
of 325,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tecnología y ciencias del agua
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them