You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surveillance of adverse events associated with 145 000 doses of COVID-19 vaccines in a Brazilian municipality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.26633/rpsp.2022.110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho, Ricardo Ruan Rocha Santana, Taise Ferreira Cavalcante, Waneska de Souza Barboza, Mércia Feitosa de Souza, Marco Aurelio de Oliveira Góes, Ângela Marinho Barreto Fontes, Marcia Estela Lopes da Silva, Diego Moura Tanajura |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,000,647
of 26,018,952 outputs
Outputs from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#253
of 1,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,358
of 435,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,018,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,496 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.