↓ Skip to main content

Magnesium sulfate vs aminophylline as a second line of treatment in children with severe acute asthma. Randomized clinical trial.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista chilena de pediatría, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Magnesium sulfate vs aminophylline as a second line of treatment in children with severe acute asthma. Randomized clinical trial.
Published in
Revista chilena de pediatría, June 2021
DOI 10.32641/andespediatr.v92i3.2969
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elias Kassisse, Joanna Jiménez, Nelly Mayo, Jorge Kassisse

Abstract

Second-line drugs for acute asthma, such as salbutamol, magnesium sulfate, and aminophylline, are generally intravenously administered. To compare the efficacy and safety of using mag nesium sulfate or aminophylline in children who did not respond to initial treatment. Randomized clinical trial. Children who did not improve the Modified Pulmonary Index Score (mPSI) receive at random magnesium sulfate (50 mg/kg/single dose) or aminophylline (5 mg/ kg/dose followed by continuous infusion at 1 mg/kg/hour for 3 hours). Primary endpoints were changes in mPSI and oxygen saturation; secondary endpoints: hospitalization rate, need for transfer to the intensive care unit, use of a third intervention, and adverse effects. 131 patients were studied (66 patients in the aminophylline group and 65 MgSO4). The mean age was 5 ± 2.3 years, the demographic and clinical parameters did not differ between the groups. In the group that received magnesium sulfate, the mPSI and oxygen saturation changed significantly in favor from 13.1 ± 1.3 to 4.9 ± 2.5 (p < 0.001) and from 3.3 ± 2.5; (p 0.021), respectively, and their risk of hospital admission (RR 0.68 95% CI [0.56, 0.82]) and of secondary failure (0.16 95% CI 95% [0 , 07; 0.38]) decreased. Only one adverse event (tachycardia) was recorded. The administration of a single dose of magnesium sulfate proved to be more effective and safe than the use of aminophylline as a second- line drug.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 20 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Revista chilena de pediatría
#229
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,515
of 456,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista chilena de pediatría
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.