↓ Skip to main content

Construction and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of mothers and caregivers on complementary feeding of infants.

Overview of attention for article published in Revista chilena de pediatría, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Construction and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of mothers and caregivers on complementary feeding of infants.
Published in
Revista chilena de pediatría, October 2020
DOI 10.32641/rchped.vi91i5.1078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marco Sierra-Zúñiga, Claudia Holguin Betancourt, Andry Yasmid Mera-Mamián, Mario Delgado-Noguera, José Andrés Calvache

Abstract

Adequate nutrition during the first two years of life is crucial for the full development of human potential. Inadequate, early, or late introduction of complementary feeding has consequences in the short- and long-term. Complementary feeding depends largely on the knowledge of the caregiver who, in Latin American countries, is usually the mother. To create and validate an ins trument to measure knowledge about complementary feeding. Observational study in which 80 community mothers and 12 expert pediatricians participated. It was carried out in two stages, the creation of the instrument (following the 7 phases proposed by Sampieri) and the va lidation through the evaluation of the apparent validity, construct and content validity, internal con sistency, and intra-observer reliability. A self-administered instrument was created that ini tially included 14 questions about maternal and caregiver's knowledge. During the validation of the construct, 3 domains were identified and four questions were eliminated. In the content validation, 10 questions of the final instrument scored higher than 9 (on a scale of 0-10) in the characteristics of quality, vocabulary, relevance, and topicality. The global internal consistency of the instrument was moderate (Cronbach's alpha: 0.64) and the intra-observer reliability was acceptable (k: 0.21-0.40) for 80% of its items. the first self-administered instrument validated in the region to measure the knowledge of mothers and caregivers about complementary feeding is presented. It will allow to design and develop strategies in relation to maternal and caregiver's knowledge of comple mentary feeding.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Unspecified 4 7%
Professor 3 5%
Lecturer 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 33 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Unspecified 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 33 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,726,252
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Revista chilena de pediatría
#391
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#330,808
of 433,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista chilena de pediatría
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.