↓ Skip to main content

European renal best practice guideline on the management and evaluation of the kidney donor and recipient.

Overview of attention for article published in Nefrología, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
European renal best practice guideline on the management and evaluation of the kidney donor and recipient.
Published in
Nefrología, March 2014
DOI 10.3265/nefrologia.pre2014.feb.12490
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julio Pascual, Daniel Abramowicz, Pierre Cochat, Frans Claas, Chris Dudley, Paul Harden, Uwe Heeman, Maryvonne Hourmant, Umberto Maggiore, Maurizio Salvadori, Goce Spasovski, Jean-Paul Squif, Juerg Steiger, Armando Torres, Raymond Vanholder, Wim Van Biesen, Ondrej Viklicky, Martin Zeier, Evi Nagler

Abstract

The purpose of this Clinical Practice Guideline is to provide guidance on evaluation of the kidney donor and transplant recipient as well as on the management of the recipient in the perioperative period. It is designed to provide information and aid decision-making. It is not intended to define a standard of care, and should neither be construed as one nor should it be interpreted as prescribing an exclusive course of management. The original version of this guideline was published in Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation and this current version is a reduced article aiming to disseminate the guideline into Spanish-speaking countries and transplant communities.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 14%
Other 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 27%