↓ Skip to main content

New clinical practice guideline on enteral feeding in very low birth weight infants; first part.

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrición Hospitalaria, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New clinical practice guideline on enteral feeding in very low birth weight infants; first part.
Published in
Nutrición Hospitalaria, August 2014
DOI 10.3305/nh.2014.30.2.7587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tomás Sánchez-Tamayo, Maria G Espinosa Fernández, María C Moreno Algarra, Verónica Fernández Romero, Jose Vallejo Triano, Elías Tapia Moreno, Enrique Salguero García

Abstract

The nutrition of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants is aimed at promoting a similar growth to that occurring in the uterus. However, in practice this is difficult to achieve and extrauterine growth restriction is frequent. The current tendency is to avoid this restriction by means of early parenteral and enteral nutrition. Nonetheless, uncertainty about many of the practices related with nutrition has resulted in a great variation in the way it is undertaken. In 2009 and 2011 in our hospital there was an unexpected increase in necrotizing enterocolitis. To check to see whether our nutrition policy was involved, we undertook a systematic review and drew up clinical practice guidelines (CPG) about enteral feeding in VLBW infants. New considerations about the duration of the fortification and the use of probiotics have led to an update of these CPG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Researcher 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 24%
Unknown 8 47%