You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preventive analgesia in patients undergoing open surgery for rotator cuff repair.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta ortopédica mexicana, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.35366/97987 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J M Martínez-Domínguez, J Quiroz-Williams, H Quíntela-Núñez Del Prado |
| Abstract |
Preventive analgesia in orthopedic surgery is becoming increasingly important because post-surgical pain management is more pleasant for the patient and allows them to initiate rehabilitation early. With this premise we consider the following hypothesis. The perception of post-surgical pain at two, 12 and 24 hours with local infiltration into the surgical wound with ropivacaine plus systemic analgesia will be less compared to patients who infiltrate with saline into the surgical wound plus systemic analgesia. A randomized double-blind, prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted in the period January 2018 to August 2018. The null hypothesis is rejected in the group valued at two hours and the null hypothesis is accepted in the groups valued at 12 and 24 hours. Ropivacaine infiltration is an effective method for managing postoperative pain for the first 2 hours in open shoulder surgery procedures. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 43% |
| Researcher | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2021.
All research outputs
#22,774,430
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Acta ortopédica mexicana
#39
of 63 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402,956
of 473,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta ortopédica mexicana
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 473,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.