↓ Skip to main content

Inspiratory muscle training in interstitial lung disease: a systematic scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, August 2021
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Inspiratory muscle training in interstitial lung disease: a systematic scoping review
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia, August 2021
DOI 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210089
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) has been described as one of the components of the treatment of chronic lung conditions such as obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. Although the number of studies showing results of IMT in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) is scarce when compared with studies in patients with COPD, evidence points to benefits of IMT in this population. This scoping review aimed to explore the role and the rationale of IMT in patients with ILD and to gather recent evidence on the effects of IMT in this population. The studies included in this review showed improvements in respiratory muscle function, quality of life, exercise capacity and dyspnea after ILD patients participated in programs that included stand-alone IMT or combined with pulmonary rehabilitation. There is still a gap in the literature to allow a clear conclusion on the indications of IMT as part of ILD treatment because of poor research design and small numbers of participants. Therefore, although IMT seems to have a positive effect in patients with ILD, current evidence prevents us from drawing a definite conclusion. Further studies need to be conducted using better research methodology to demonstrate and confirm the positive effects of IMT.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 53 60%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 14%
Unspecified 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 52 59%