↓ Skip to main content

Routine spirometry in cystic fibrosis patients: impact on pulmonary exacerbation diagnosis and FEV1 decline

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal de Pneumologia, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Routine spirometry in cystic fibrosis patients: impact on pulmonary exacerbation diagnosis and FEV1 decline
Published in
Jornal de Pneumologia, June 2022
DOI 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolina Silva Barboza de Aquino, Joaquim Carlos Rodrigues, Luiz Vicente Ribeiro Ferreira da Silva-Filho

Abstract

Pulmonary disease in cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterised by recurrent episodes of pulmonary exacerbations (PExs), with acute and long-term declines in lung function (FEV1). The study sought to determine whether routine spirometry increases the frequency of PEx diagnosis, resulting in benefits to long-term pulmonary function. CF patients in the 5- to 18-year age bracket were followed for 1 year, during which they underwent spirometry before every medical visit. The main variables were the frequency of PEx diagnosis and use of antibiotics; the use of spirometry as a criterion for PEx diagnosis (a decline ≥ 10% in baseline FEV1); and median percent predicted FEV1 over time. The data were compared with those for the previous 24-month period, when spirometry was performed electively every 6 months. The study included 80 CF patients. PExs were diagnosed in 27.5% of the visits, with a mean frequency of 1.44 PExs per patient/year in 2014 vs. 0.88 PExs per patient/year in 2012 (p = 0.0001) and 1.15 PExs per patient/year in 2013 (p = 0.05). FEV1 was used as a diagnostic feature in 83.5% of PExs. In 21.9% of PExs, the decision to initiate antibiotics was solely based on an acute decline in FEV1. The median percent predicted FEV1 during the follow-up year was 85.7%, being 78.5% in 2013 and 76.8% in 2012 (p > 0.05). The median percent predicted FEV1 remained above 80% during the two years after the study. Routine spirometry is associated with higher rates of diagnosis and treatment of PExs, possibly impacting long-term pulmonary function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 61%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Psychology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#17,077,334
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Jornal de Pneumologia
#297
of 723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246,413
of 443,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal de Pneumologia
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 723 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.