You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumo de Sal do Himalaia e Sal de Mesa entre Indivíduos Hipertensos
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, May 2022
|
| DOI | 10.36660/abc.20220243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mariana de Souza Dorna, Marcos Mitsuo Seki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2024.
All research outputs
#22,902,730
of 25,539,438 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1,005
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#380,344
of 446,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#29
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,539,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.