↓ Skip to main content

Implantação de Marca-passo em Pacientes com Doença de Chagas: Estudo Caso-Controle de Fatores Contextuais Associados e Prognóstico

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2026
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

bluesky
1 Bluesky user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Implantação de Marca-passo em Pacientes com Doença de Chagas: Estudo Caso-Controle de Fatores Contextuais Associados e Prognóstico
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2026
DOI 10.36660/abc.20250003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) is the most severe manifestation of Chagas disease and may present with bradyarrhythmias requiring pacemaker (PM) implantation. 1. To identify contextual factors associated with PM implantation among individuals with CCC. 2. To assess the prognosis (death) in these groups over a 4-year follow-up period. 1. Nested case-control study within the SaMi-Trop cohort. We matched cases (patients with CCC who had a PM implanted between waves 1 and 2 of the study) with controls at a 1:3 ratio, considering equivalence in baseline cardiac severity. Independent variables related to the municipal context were considered. Binary logistic regression was conducted. 2. Survival analysis to evaluate the prognosis of these groups, adjusted for clinical variables (Cox regression), considering death as the outcome. Conclusions were based on a significance level of 5%. The study included 46 cases and 138 controls. The odds of PM implantation were higher among individuals residing in municipalities with: larger population (odds ratio [OR]: 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 to 9.6), higher coverage of the Family Health Strategy (OR: 5.3; 95% CI: 1.8 to 15.8), and with a lower number of electrocardiographs per thousand inhabitants (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.0 to 6.6). Considering 4 years of follow-up, death was observed in 32.6% of cases and 21.2% of controls. Only ejection fraction affected survival (relative risk: 7.2; 95% CI: 3.6 to 14.2). Contextual factors interfered with PM implantation. However, PM implantation did not influence death over 4 years of follow-up, which was associated only with ejection fraction.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 100%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2026.
All research outputs
#29,531,648
of 32,721,978 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#1,568
of 1,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,361
of 358,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,721,978 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.