↓ Skip to main content

Training pedologist for soil mapping: Contextualizing methods and its accuracy using the project pedagogy approach

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Training pedologist for soil mapping: Contextualizing methods and its accuracy using the project pedagogy approach
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, January 2021
DOI 10.36783/18069657rbcs20200130
Authors

Elias Mendes Costa, Marcos Bacis Ceddia, Felipe Nascimento dos Santos, Laiz de Oliveira Silva, Igor Prata Terra de Rezende, Douglath Alves Correa Fernandes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 16%
Student > Master 3 16%
Unspecified 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 21%
Unspecified 2 11%
Environmental Science 2 11%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 10 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#15,913,878
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#110
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,272
of 531,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.