↓ Skip to main content

Differences between caves with and without bats in a Brazilian karst habitat

Overview of attention for article published in Zoologia, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences between caves with and without bats in a Brazilian karst habitat
Published in
Zoologia, June 2017
DOI 10.3897/zoologia.34.e13732
Authors

Camila G. Torquetti, Marcos Xavier Silva, Sônia A. Talamoni

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 17%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 43%
Environmental Science 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2017.
All research outputs
#21,160,107
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,624
of 336,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.5. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them