You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An ethical discussion of the use of transcranial direct current stimulation for cognitive enhancement in healthy individuals: a fictional case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychology & Neuroscience, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3922/j.psns.2014.010 |
| Authors |
Olivia M. Lapenta, Claudia A. Valasek, André R. Brunoni, Paulo S. Boggio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 65 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 21% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Psychology & Neuroscience
#29
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,566
of 319,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology & Neuroscience
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.