↓ Skip to main content

Que princípios éticos devem definir o estabelecimento de prioridades entre doentes?

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Que princípios éticos devem definir o estabelecimento de prioridades entre doentes?
Published in
Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, July 2017
DOI 10.4000/rccs.6681
Authors

Micaela Pinho, Ana Pinto Borges

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 22%
Librarian 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 22%
Philosophy 1 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 11%
Mathematics 1 11%
Computer Science 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais
#138
of 153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,449
of 326,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.