You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Managing conflict-generating invasive species in South Africa: Challenges and trade-offs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.4102/abc.v47i2.2160 |
| Authors |
Tsungai Zengeya, Philip Ivey, Darragh J. Woodford, Olaf Weyl, Ana Novoa, Ross Shackleton, David Richardson, Brian Van Wilgen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 227 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Researcher | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 32% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#781,068
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation
#3
of 222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,934
of 326,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bothalia - African Biodiversity & Conservation
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.