↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of broad screening with Ebola rapid diagnostic tests in Forécariah, Guinea

Overview of attention for article published in African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 135)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Implementation of broad screening with Ebola rapid diagnostic tests in Forécariah, Guinea
Published in
African Journal of Laboratory Medicine, February 2017
DOI 10.4102/ajlm.v6i1.484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frantz Jean Louis, Jennifer Y. Huang, Yacouba K. Nebie, Lamine Koivogui, Gayatri Jayaraman, Nadine Abiola, Amanda Vansteelandt, Mary C. Worrel, Judith Shang, Louise B. Murphy, David L. Fitter, Barbara J. Marston, Lise Martel

Abstract

Laboratory-enhanced surveillance is critical for rapidly detecting the potential re-emergence of Ebola virus disease. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) for Ebola antigens could expand diagnostic capacity for Ebola virus disease. The Guinean National Coordination for Ebola Response conducted a pilot implementation to determine the feasibility of broad screening of patients and corpses with the OraQuick(®) Ebola RDT. The implementation team developed protocols and trained healthcare workers to screen patients and corpses in Forécariah prefecture, Guinea, from 15 October to 30 November 2015. Data collected included number of consultations, number of fevers reported or measured, number of tests performed for patients or corpses and results of confirmatory RT-PCR testing. Data on malaria RDT results were collected for comparison. Feedback from Ebola RDT users was collected informally during supervision visits and forums. There were 3738 consultations at the 15 selected healthcare facilities; 74.6% of consultations were for febrile illness. Among 2787 eligible febrile patients, 2633 were tested for malaria and 1628 OraQuick(®) Ebola RDTs were performed. A total of 322 OraQuick(®) Ebola RDTs were conducted on corpses. All Ebola tests on eligible patients were negative. Access to Ebola testing was expanded by the implementation of RDTs in an emergency situation. Feedback from Ebola RDT users and lessons learned will contribute to improving quality for RDT expansion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Other 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 7 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
#22
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,568
of 324,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age from African Journal of Laboratory Medicine
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,937 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them