You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Measuring and modelling evapotranspiration in a South African grassland: Comparison of two improved Penman-Monteith formulations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Water SA, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.4314/wsa.v44i3.16 |
Authors |
Onalenna Gwate, Sukhmani K Mantel, Anthony R Palmer, Lesley A Gibson, Zahn Munch |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 18% |
Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 27% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 11 | 22% |
Engineering | 5 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 23 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Water SA
#31
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,798
of 340,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water SA
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them