↓ Skip to main content

Dyskeratosis congenita

Overview of attention for article published in Autopsy and Case Reports, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 201)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dyskeratosis congenita
Published in
Autopsy and Case Reports, September 2020
DOI 10.4322/acr.2020.203
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorenzo Gitto, Robert Stoppacher, Timothy Eric Richardson, Serenella Serinelli

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Materials Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 8 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#6,741,265
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Autopsy and Case Reports
#29
of 201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,276
of 424,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autopsy and Case Reports
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them