↓ Skip to main content

Integrating clinical research into clinical decision making.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#43 of 279)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating clinical research into clinical decision making.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2011
DOI 10.4415/ann_11_01_07
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark R Tonelli

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine has placed a general priority on knowledge gained from clinical research for clinical decision making. However, knowledge derived from empiric, population-based research, while valued for its ability to limit bias, is not directly applicable to the care of individual patients. The gap between clinical research and individual patient care centers on the fact that empiric research is not generally designed to answer questions of direct relevance to individual patients. Clinicians must utilize other forms of medical knowledge, including pathophysiologic rationale and clinical experience, in order to arrive at the best medical decision for a particular patient. In addition, clinicians must also elucidate and account for the goals and values of individual patients as well as barriers and facilitators of care inherent in the system in which they practice. Evidence-based guidelines and protocols, then, can never be prescriptive. Clinicians must continue to rely on clinical judgment, negotiating potentially conflicting warrants for action, in an effort to arrive at the best decision for a particular patient.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 800%
Student > Bachelor 5 500%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 300%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 300%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 300%
Other 4 400%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 1000%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 500%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 400%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 100%
Sports and Recreations 1 100%
Other 3 300%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,357,897
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#43
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,622
of 190,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.