↓ Skip to main content

Waterborne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Waterborne outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, December 2012
DOI 10.4415/ann_12_04_10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel M Chalmers

Abstract

Water is the most commonly reported vehicle of transmission in Cryptosporidium outbreaks. While mains drinking water quality is highly regulated in industrialised countries, treated recreational water venues remain highly variable and these have emerged as important settings in the transmission of cryptosporidiosis. Epidemiological investigations of outbreaks benefit from supplementary microbiological evidence and, more recently, the application of molecular typing data to link isolates from cases to each other and to suspected sources. This article documents how waterborne Cryptosporidium outbreaks are identified and reported, how such outbreaks have acted as drivers of regulatory change, and some of the recent developments in the detection and investigation of these outbreaks and their spread, especially the application of molecular typing assays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2023.
All research outputs
#782,326
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#1
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,591
of 285,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.