You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Viral infections acquired indoors through airborne, droplet or contact transmission.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.4415/ann_13_02_03 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giuseppina La Rosa, Marta Fratini, Simonetta Della Libera, Marcello Iaconelli, Michele Muscillo |
| Abstract |
Indoor human environments, including homes, offices, schools, workplaces, transport systems and other settings, often harbor potentially unsafe microorganisms. Most previous studies of bioaerosols in indoor environments have addressed contamination with bacteria or fungi. Reports on the presence of viral aerosols in indoor air are scarce, however, despite the fact that viruses are probably the most common cause of infection acquired indoor. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 8 | 18% |
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 38 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 400% |
| France | 1 | 100% |
| Portugal | 1 | 100% |
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 3700% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 2900% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 2800% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 2200% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 1200% |
| Other | 52 | 5200% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 3400% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 2300% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 2200% |
| Engineering | 15 | 1500% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 1100% |
| Other | 58 | 5800% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,166,854
of 25,920,652 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#3
of 280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,447
of 291,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,920,652 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 280 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.