↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação da completude e da oportunidade das notificações de malária na Amazônia Brasileira, 2003-2012

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Avaliação da completude e da oportunidade das notificações de malária na Amazônia Brasileira, 2003-2012
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000100003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

to evaluate the completeness and timeliness of malaria case reporting, diagnosis and treatment in the Brazilian Amazon. this is a descriptive study using data from 23 fields of notification forms recorded on the Malaria Epidemiological Surveillance Information System (Sivep-Malaria) between 2003 and 2012. data completeness was good in 86.0% of fields (≥90.0% filled in); there was timely recording of 40.6% of notifications at the Municipal Health Departments (0-7 days following notification) and 75.6% at the Ministry of Health (0-30 days following notification); timely diagnosis and timely treatment occurred in 44.6% and 45.4% of patients, respectively. most notification forms had good completeness; timeliness in recording notifications was below international standards; timeliness of diagnosis and treatment was below the Ministry of Health recommendations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2016.
All research outputs
#24,997,390
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#364
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,983
of 406,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.