↓ Skip to main content

Atraso do diagnóstico da tuberculose em adultos em um município paulista em 2009: estudo transversal

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Atraso do diagnóstico da tuberculose em adultos em um município paulista em 2009: estudo transversal
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, September 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000300011
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

to evaluate patient and health service characteristics associated with tuberculosis (TB) diagnosis delay. this was a cross-sectional study conducted in São José do Rio Preto-SP in 2009; the 'entry point' and 'access to diagnosis' dimensions of the Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCAT) were selected to analyze patient and HS delay. 99 TB patients were included in the study; the median time related to patient and HS delay was 15 days; delay in seeking services was lower among smokers (PR= 0.71; 95%CI 0.54;0.94) and alcohol users (PR=0.75; 95%CI 0.57;0.99); TB diagnosis delay was related to not being able to get a medical appointment on the same day (PR=1.63; 95%CI 1.22;2.18), TB not being suspected (PR=2.07; 95%CI 1.18;3.62) and seeking care in health services four times or more (PR=2.34; 95%CI 1.55;3.53). delay in seeking care was lower among smokers and alcohol users; shortcomings in access to diagnosis characterized health services delay.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 32%
Student > Master 5 18%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,697,333
of 27,787,196 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#313
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,797
of 316,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,787,196 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.