↓ Skip to main content

Tendência da incidência de dengue no Brasil, 2002-2012

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Tendência da incidência de dengue no Brasil, 2002-2012
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, October 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000400006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Wendt Böhm, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Rosália Garcia Neves, Thaynã Ramos Flores, Bruno Pereira Nunes, Andrea Wendt Böhm, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Rosália Garcia Neves, Thaynã Ramos Flores, Bruno Pereira Nunes

Abstract

to analyze dengue incidence trend in Brazil from 2002 to 2012. this was an ecological study with data of the Information System for Notifiable Diseases (Sinan); the incidence rate was calculated by age groups, states and macroregions, through Prais-Winsten regression. dengue incidence rates in Brazil, in 2002 and 2012, were of 401.6 and 301.5 per 100,000 inhabitants, respectively; annual increment rates were stable (21.4%; 95%CI -19.8;83.7) in most of the states, except for Alagoas (38.9%; 95%CI 5.1;83.5) and Tocantins (50.4%; 95%CI 12.6;100.7); the North Region was the only region to present increase trend in the incidence of dengue. although rates have remained stable in most of the states, they are still high in Brazil; broader public policies focusing on new dengue control strategies are necessary.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 24%
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 29 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Mathematics 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 30 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2017.
All research outputs
#23,974,980
of 34,242,763 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#263
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,052
of 337,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,242,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.