↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneidade de comportamentos de risco para infecções sexualmente transmissíveis em adolescentes brasileiros, 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simultaneidade de comportamentos de risco para infecções sexualmente transmissíveis em adolescentes brasileiros, 2012
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, July 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosália Garcia Neves, Andrea Wendt, Thaynã Ramos Flores, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Francine dos Santos Costa, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Bruno Pereira Nunes, Rosália Garcia Neves, Andrea Wendt, Thaynã Ramos Flores, Caroline dos Santos Costa, Francine dos Santos Costa, Luciana Tovo-Rodrigues, Bruno Pereira Nunes

Abstract

to analyze the simultaneity of two groups of risk behaviors for sexually transmitted infections in Brazilian adolescents. cross-sectional study with data from the National Adolescent School-based Health Survey 2012; the outcomes were (1) simultaneous consumption of alcohol, tobacco and drugs (at least two), and (2) no use of condom and having two or more sexual partners. simultaneity of consumption of alcohol, tobacco and drugs was present in 14.7% of the boys and 21.5% of the girls, and was more prevalent among white individuals, with more educated mothers, and who did not live with their parents; approximately 12.0% of the adolescents presented simultaneity of no use of condom and having two or more sexual partners; this was more common among younger boys, not white (PR=1.22; 95%CI 1.10;1.36), and who did not live with their parents (PR=1.78; 95%CI 1.48;2.16), whilst among girls, this outcome was associated with higher age. both outcomes were associated with different characteristics, depending on the sex of the adolescent.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 20%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2017.
All research outputs
#27,362,056
of 33,127,577 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#360
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,929
of 352,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#18
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,127,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.