↓ Skip to main content

Unusual clinical phenotype of Stargardt disease

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Unusual clinical phenotype of Stargardt disease
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, January 2021
DOI 10.5935/0004-2749.20210064
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pedro Molina-Solana, María José Morillo-Sánchez, Cristina Méndez-Vidal, Manuel Ramos-Jiménez, Borja Domínguez-Serrano, Guillermo Antiñolo, Enrique Rodríguez-de-la-Rúa-Franch

Abstract

Mutations in the ABCA4 gene are a common cause of Stargardt disease; however, other retinal phenotypes have also been associated with mutations in this gene. We describe an observational case report of an unusual clinical phenotype of Stargardt disease. The ophthalmological examination included best corrected visual acuity, color and autofluorescence photography, fluorescein angiography, optical coherence tomography, and electrophysiology tests. Targeted next-generation sequencing of 99 genes associated with inherited retinal dystrophies was performed in the index patient. A 48-year-old woman presented with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 and 20/20. Fundoscopy revealed perifoveal yellow flecked-like lesions. Fluorescein angiography and fundus autofluorescence findings were consistent with pattern dystrophy. Pattern electroretinogram demonstrated bilateral decrease of p50 values. Genetic testing identified two heterozygous missense mutations, c.428C>T, p.(Pro143Leu) and c.3113C>T, p.(Ala.1038Val), in the ABCA4 gene. Based on our results, we believe that these particular mutations in the ABCA4 gene could be associated with a specific disease phenotype characterized by funduscopic appearance similar to pattern dystrophy. A detailed characterization of the retinal phenotype in patients carrying specific mutations in ABCA4 is crucial to understand disease expression and ensure optimal clinical care for patients with inherited retinal dystrophies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Lecturer 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2021.
All research outputs
#15,181,325
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#125
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,936
of 519,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#3
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.