You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aplicabilidade da avaliação global subjetiva e malnutrition inflammation score na avaliação do estado nutricional na doença renal crônica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.5935/0101-2800.20140034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernanda Guedes Bigogno, Renata Lemos Fetter, Carla Maria Avesani |
| Abstract |
Up to now, there is no single method that provides complete and unambiguous assessment of the nutritional status in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, it has been recommended the use of many nutritional markers. The subjective global assessment (SGA) contains questions regarding the clinical history and physical examination. Subsequently, other versions of the SGA were developed. The malnutrition inflammation score (MIS) was also developed from the original version of the SGA and consists of 70% of the items common to SGA in addition to objective questions. Since many modifications were proposed in the original form of SGA, the use of these questionnaires in CKD patients has increased substantially in clinical practice. Therefore, this paper aims to review the applicability of the SGA and MIS when applied to assess the nutritional status of CKD patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#306
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,470
of 319,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#19
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.