↓ Skip to main content

Avaliação do conhecimento sobre terapia renal substitutiva dos profissionais de saúde nas regiões de Juiz de Fora, São João Nepomuceno e Santos Dumont

Overview of attention for article published in Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avaliação do conhecimento sobre terapia renal substitutiva dos profissionais de saúde nas regiões de Juiz de Fora, São João Nepomuceno e Santos Dumont
Published in
Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, January 2015
DOI 10.5935/0101-2800.20150059
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alyne Schreider, Natália Maria da Silva Fernandes

Abstract

In line with the Editorial "How to explain the low penetration of peritoneal dialysis in Brazil," published in 2014 in the Brazilian Journal of Nephrology written by Professor Hugo Abensur, we show the results of a study "Assessment of knowledge on renal replacement therapy in the health workers of the regions: Juiz de Fora, São João Nepomuceno e Santos Dumont "(Approved by the Ethics Committee of UFJF CAAE: 23659213.8.0000.5147 and funded by FAPEMIG under APQ number 03626-12). We conducted a study with theObjective:to evaluate the knowledge of RRT for the health professionals of Juiz de Fora, São João Nepomuceno e Santos Dumont. A Cross-sectional study from April 2014 to April 2015 with the population of health professionals (doctors, nurses and nursing assistance) who worked in the emergency units (EU) and primary health care (PHC) . Health professionals were interviewed using a semi-structured questionnaire, based on a clinical case of a patient diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease who developed worsening renal function; initially presented creatinine 1.8 mg/dL and evaluated to 12 mg/dL. Different questions did made for professional category. We interviewed 75 professionals from 8 municipalities, 26.7% physicians, 32% nurses and 41.3% of nurse assistance. A mean age was 38 years. Of these 70.7% were working in PHC and 29.3% in EU. Both the EU as in PHC, the frequency of cases care was similar between once a month, once every three months. Most would forward the patient to hospital and indicate RRT. The RRT is most suitable for physicians was HD (> 90% of cases) and less than 10% as first choice indicate was PD. The association of "creatinine" and "renal function" is appropriate in over 90% of respondents, despite no association with the same level of glomerular filtration when this question is asked. More than 90% of non-medical professionals wish to conduct education/training in nephrology/RRT. We observed that most professionals do not indicate peritoneal dialysis, especially medical professionals from EU or PHC; 90% of them indicated HD. On nurses from PHC 52.1% indicated HD and 9.4% DP. Those EU, 41.6% indicated HD and 26.6% PD. We conclude that minority health professionals indicate PD as first choice and the qualitative question often refer deficit "knowledge in the area" and are interested in conducting training/capacity building.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Other 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 21%
Computer Science 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2015.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#325
of 383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,121
of 361,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 383 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.